• Find Clues in Family Photos to Further Research

    Have you looked at your old family photos for research clues? No, I mean really look at them. Did you look at the surroundings, the weather, the cars, the uniforms? Family history clues could be right in front of your eyes in old photos. d

    Finding those clues and knowing how to turn that into information can be difficult. Often those clues are right in front us but we are not looking past the surface. How can photos open up a wealth of information and further our research? Let’s take a closer look.

    Uniforms: Military, Civil Service, and Businesses

    Uniforms in photos can open up whole new avenue for your research. Are relatives in any of your photos wearing a military uniform? Even in group photos a relative may be wearing a full uniform, a hat, a medal, or even have a military tattoo.

    In the photo below are two relatives both wearing military uniforms. One is Navy and the other is Army. The child in the photo is my aunt and on the back it says ‘and uncles’. I am able to determine this is most likely my grandmother’s brothers. I can go to military archives and gain further knowledge on their time in the service as well as the tours in World War II.

    The photo below includes my grandfather on the right. In this photo he is wearing a uniform. He is also standing in front of a train. Putting those two facts together and looking into uniform descriptions (most notably the hat) I find out that this is a train conductor’s hat and uniform. This also would explain why he is standing in front of a train with another man who looks to be wearing a train workers uniform.

    Buildings

    Look at the buildings in family photos. Really take a hard look and use a magnifying glass if you need to. Is there a name on any businesses? Do you see a number on the house or structure?

    The photo below was in the possession of my mother’s family. I was uncertain of why and who may have lived in the home. I had looked at the photo many times but could only wonder. It wasn’t until I really scrutinized every part of this picture and finally noticed faint writing at the bottom of the picture. I used editing software within MyHeritage to colorize the photo and increase the contrast until I was able to make out the writing that appeared to be in pencil. Finally, I had an answer: “Homestead 1808 Washington St.”. I instantly knew that my grandmother’s family had lived on Washington Street in my hometown of Michigan City, Indiana. Street view of the home in present day also confirmed this to be the same home. They matched!

    Below is another photo that I had in my possession for a long time. I was always fixated on the people in the photo and their faces. Once again I used editing software (MyHeritage) to colorize the photo and add contrast and noticed writing on the bottom. The text “Home E. Sixth St” becomes visible.

    I knew this picture was from my maternal grandmother’s side so I went to the census records of 1880, 1900 and 1910 to see if I could gain any insight. In 1900 the same family that ended up moving to the house in the above photo on Washington St. in 1910 lived on E. Sixth Street first. The people in the photo also matched the genders and general ages of those on the census record. I now had photos of both of their homes ranging from about 1898-1960! This house was torn down ages ago to make room for an outlet mall so I could not conduct street view comparisons.

    The ability to look closer at old family photographs and scrutinize the details can unlock clues to further your research. We often focus on the faces and ponder what year the photo was taken and miss other details that can tell us more about their lives.

    Clothing, hats, pins, buildings, weather, cars, and so much more can tell us the lives our ancestors lived and the events they went through. Discover more in photos, discover more about your family.

  • Genealogy 101: Dangers of Following the Pack

    Now that the quarantine life is slowly disappearing and we ease back to normal, my research is picking back up. Over the past couple of months I have been able to spend more time on Ancestry.com and MyHeritage.com. There has been a glaring problem that makes my genealogical heart sink…too many researchers following the pack.

    Not everyone that joins sites such as Ancestry.com are researchers and I understand that. Some join one time for a free trial or short period of time to do a quick search just to find out what this craze is all about. Others just received their DNA test back and want to jump on for a quick look see. The last of us are true researchers who have spent years enthralled in the endless documents, stories, dna tests, dusty books, and local libraries.

    This diverse clientele within genealogy websites leads to a reckless following of the pack. You do a quick search of your great grandfather and find several family trees and assume the person that has the tree is an expert and has done their due diligence with their research. You then start your own tree and add in the information from the tree online. Now you think, “Yes! Look at all this information. I know so much about my family now!”. Problem? You followed the pack. You did not do your own research to ensure that the tree you found online is actually true.

    George Bader (left) born in Michigan City, Indiana

    Following the pack goes wrong….

    My great great grandfather, George Bader, was born in Northwest Indiana in 1859. I have never been able to pin down a date but he was born in Michigan City in 1859 and his parents are Stephen and Teresa Bader as census records show. I lived in this town and have seen the headstones and followed the paper trail.

    George Bader in 1860 at age 1 with father, Stephen Bader (sometimes mistaken for Bailey)

    Now, the next big town south of Michigan City is LaPorte, Indiana. There was another Bader family living there about the same time my Bader family lived just north in Michigan City. I have never been able to confirm if possibly these two Bader families are related or not. More coincidentally, there was a George Bader born to a Nicholas Bader in 1855 in LaPorte (somewhat close to my George Bader born in 1859).

    Using birth, death, marriage, and census records, I have been able to trace my direct ancestry back to George Bader of Michigan City. His marriage certificate shows he was married to Mary Kearns in Michigan City. I can then trace him through census records where he left his wife, lived in Chicago and then went out to Oregon where he died and his death certificate confirms birth year and birth city. This is my George Bader.

    George Bader marries Mary Kearns in Michigan City in 1880

    The other trees on Ancestry.com seemed to simply follow one or two other people that just simply assumed that the George Bader born in LaPorte was the same one born in Michigan City without doing the paper trail. They are two very different people.

    George Bader having left his wife and living in Chicago before moving to Portland where he died and death certificate states birth as Michigan City, Indiana.

    Break the Pack Mentality

    Following the pack and using trees created by others on genealogical websites is full of assumptions and simply put…reckless. Making assumptions in research can only lead you into a web that is hard to detach from. The longer you believe something to be true, the harder it is to remove that belief.

    When you begin research (or have even been doing it for years) take the family trees you see online with a grain of salt. Look at all of them with suspicion.

    Other trees have inaccurate information- My George Bader did marry Mary Kearns and was married in 1880 and lived in Chicago in 1900 but was NOT born in 1855 nor were his parents Nicholas and Mary. This info combines two different George Bader’s.

    Assuming one George Bader could have been the only George Bader in a county, even in the mid-late 1800’s is naive. If there is yet another rule in genealogy it is to never assume!

    Also, pay attention to city versus county. Michigan City is in LaPorte County but the county seat is the city of LaPorte. Often records may come up as ‘LaPorte’ but it refers to the county and not the city.

    The devil is in the details but if you brush over the details it can completely derail your research- often, without you knowing.